<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>andrewphelps.com - Latest Comments in KPBS/Wal-Mart disclosure controversy</title><link>http://andrewphelps.disqus.com/</link><description>Andrew Phelps is a journalist in Boston.</description><atom:link href="https://andrewphelps.disqus.com/kpbswal_mart_disclosure_controversy/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2004 01:04:25 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: KPBS/Wal-Mart disclosure controversy</title><link>http://www.andrewphelps.com/2004/09/kpbswalmart-disclosure-controversy.php#comment-18457478</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No way - that's Terry Gross saying those announcements? I was sure it was a robot - or that "read text" function on an Apple.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">oso</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2004 01:04:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: KPBS/Wal-Mart disclosure controversy</title><link>http://www.andrewphelps.com/2004/09/kpbswalmart-disclosure-controversy.php#comment-18457476</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is definitely unscientific; I listen to KPBS daily and I must have tuned out the "abundant" Wal-Mart underwriting announcements because it came as a surprise to me. Jack in the Box underwriting announcemnts do abound, as well as many others that come to mind, but not Wal-Mart's.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My favorite underwriting announcements are those of Terry Gross on Fresh Air. When she makes the announcments I envision her eyes rolling back into her head as she goes into her monotone deadpan delivery, the audio equivalent of 6 point all-caps printed disclaimers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Maybe I've tuned out Wal-Mart's underwriting announcments because they're delivered in the same manner?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Foltz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2004 19:06:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: KPBS/Wal-Mart disclosure controversy</title><link>http://www.andrewphelps.com/2004/09/kpbswalmart-disclosure-controversy.php#comment-18457473</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I actually agree with you Andrew, and have very little to add beyond that.  I don't think it's a huge deal, really, but it certainly wouldn't have hurt to disclose it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Then again, if a newspaper runs a positive story on one of its advertisers, it's pretty much never going to be disclosed, and it's rarely harmful (though sometimes it can be -- remember LAT/Staples?).  Just because of the way public broadcasting works, there may be the idea that big sponsors have more sway than big advertisers in private media, but I'm not so sure.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2004 18:31:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: KPBS/Wal-Mart disclosure controversy</title><link>http://www.andrewphelps.com/2004/09/kpbswalmart-disclosure-controversy.php#comment-18457472</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, I was definitely not "furious," but I do think it is a step back in KPBS's integrity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And I agree that disclosure is for sure not necessary in all cases - yours is a good example - but journalists should disclose when there is a possible confict of interest. Which with the Wal-Mart story there was. (by the way, did you hear what the Santee mayor said about Wal-Mart and how it's "against policy" do say who the biggest tax renovator is in their city?)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm curious to hear from more reporters - especially from KPBS.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">oso</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2004 15:47:17 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>